Monday, April 4th, 2011


Tax Shelter Definition :

  • A financial arrangement designed to reduce tax liability.
  • Tax shelters are any method of reducing taxable income resulting in a reduction of the payments to tax collecting entities, including state and federal governments. The methodology can vary depending on local and international tax laws.
  • A method used by investors to legally avoid or reduce tax liabilities.

Direct Definition from the CRA AGENCY Website.

Tax shelters are defined in the Income Tax Act. In very general terms, a tax shelter includes either a gifting arrangement or the acquisition of property, where it is represented to the purchaser or donor that the tax benefits and deductions arising from the arrangement or acquisition will equal or exceed the net costs of entering into the arrangement or the property. Also, a gifting arrangement where the donor incurs a limited recourse debt related to the gift will be a tax shelter. Generally a limited recourse debt is one where the borrower is not at risk for the repayment.

The General Overview:

Tax shelters, as put in to perspective by the definition are an arrangement that reduces tax liabilities. Less tax liability means more disposable income or Retained Profit.  It’s because of this that many businesses have resorted to illegal forms of Tax havens. Tax Shelters include investments in equipment leasing, breeding and cattle feeding programs, real estate, and gas and oil companies. There are some Tax Shelters which are legal and there are some which are illegal.

Legal Tax Shelter.

  • Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) is a flexible investment account that can help you meet both your short- and long-term goals.
  • Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) is a personal savings plan registered with the Canadian federal government allowing you to save for the future on a tax-sheltered basis.

TFSA

•No maximum age
•Not tax-deductible
•Savings grow tax-free
RRSP
•Until the end of the year in which you turn 71
•Yes, reduces taxable income
•Savings grow Tax-deferred (not taxed until withdrawn)

Major developments

Illegal forms of Tax Shelters

Financing arrangements:

This is a common form of illegal financing arrangement as it would see the business or individual paying high levels of interest to another party thus reducing the investment income even to the extent of recording a loss. However the individual will actually create a massive capital gain when one withdraws the investment. The tax benefit comes from the fact that capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than the normal investment income such as interest or dividend.

Canada has had its fair share of illicit Financial arrangements. An example would be that of the

Offshore Companies

In most jurisdictions authorities will not seek to tax companies which they treat as non-resident, save perhaps for a nominal fee -$350 BVI, £320 Isle of Man etc. Taxation legislations differ from country to country, and it is because of this that some countries will choose to avoid taxation in their home country or in a host country. This is mainly done in a bid to reduce the Tax liability and thus Tax benefits can be exploited. Example: If an Import company buys $1 of goods from India and sell for $3, Import Co. will pay tax on $2 of taxable income. However, tax benefits can be exploited if Import Co. is to setup an offshore subsidiary in the foreign nation to buy the same goods for $1, sell the goods to Import Co. for $3 and sell it again in the domestic market for $3. This allows Import Co. to report taxable income of $0 (because it was purchased for $3 and sold for $3), thus paying no tax.

Here is a video to further illustrate this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhD6je4fQu8

The Penalties

  • For providing misleading information upon the application for a Tax shelter scheme, the principal or agent is liable to a penalty greater than a $500 minimum fee of CAD$500.
  • For misrepresentation in tax planning arrangements, the principal will be liable to a minimum penalty of CAD$1000
  • For failing to provide the tax shelter identification number, the principal is liable to pay CAD$100.
  • Providing an incorrect tax shelter identification number
    • A fine from 100% to 200% of the cost of the tax shelter interest.
    • Imprisonment up to two years.
    • Both a fine and imprisonment.
  • Accountants across the world have lost their integrity.
  • This mainly because it is the accountants that are responsible for recording overstated balances and for preparing false receipts that will be assessed by the government.
  • However Tax shelters were set up to promote good behavior and offer assistance to the masses. It is the poor behavior of the few that has tarnished this image and with it the Image of Accountants.

Tax shelters are usually created by the government to promote a certain desirable behaviour, usually a long term investment, to help the economy; in turn, this generates even more tax revenue. Alternatively, the shelters may be a means to promote social behaviours.

Citations

•          Santiago. (2010). Legal Tax Shelter Programs Can Save You Money…Find Out How. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from <http://www.mytaxmoneyback.com/canadaincometaxguide/2010/04/27/tax-shelters-are-not-a-legal-form-of-tax-avoidance-myth-buster-file-3-3/>

•          RBC Royal Bank.(2011) Comparing TFSAs and RSPs: How do they stack up? Retrieved March 24, 2011, from < http://www.rbcroyalbank.com/products/taxfreesavings/tfsa-vs-rsp.html>

http://business.mapsofindia.com/india-tax/concepts/shelters.html

Lehman Brothers and Ernst & Young

Lehman Brothers

General Information

  • Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
  • Investment bank; the smallest giant on Wall Street
  • Survived 158 years
  • 60 offices around the world
  • More than 28,000 staff

Brief Timeline

1993 – Richard Fuld became the CEO of Lehman

  • Grew from traditional investment bank to using borrowed money to play the market itself.

2000 – Borrowed significant amount of money to fund their investment in the housing markets.

2007 – The firm closed its subprime lender: BNC Mortgage

  • Repo 105 is used as a tool for Lehman to extend and delay their downfall.
  • $27 million reduction in goodwill

2008 – Reported loss of 3 billion dollars; sets $6 billion dollars stock sale

Sept. 15th, 2008 – Filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

  • Largest bankruptcy filing in US history, holding over $600 billion assets.

Effects to the Accounting Industry

  • The decisions made that led to the fall of Lehman were most miss calculation in investment choices
  • Since the issue is very recent, it is still under investigations.

Repo 105

It’s a repurchase agreement

–       Short term loan in exchange for collateral

–       Lehman: Categorized as sales instead of loan (Flashy Accounting!)

–       Used international law of Britain to define sales

–       Over 50 Billion in Repo 105 transactions

–       Repo 105 used to temporarily remove the securities inventory from the balance sheet

–       Repo money used to pay down liabilities

–       Decreased leverage misled investors into thinking the company was very healthy

Ernst and Young

General Information

–       Big 4 Accounting Firm

–       Involved in a few other scandals (Akai Holdings, Sons of Gwalia)

–       Responsible for: External Auditing and Investigating the internal fraud claim

Brief Timeline

  • 2003: HealthSouth Corp

– $109 million settlement of investor lawsuits

  • 2009: Bally’s Total Fitness Holding Corp.

– Fined 8.5 million for approving fraudulent statements

  • 2009: Akai Holdings ($200 million settlement)

– falsified court documents to avoid negligence charges

  • 2009: Sons of Gwalia

– $125 Million (AUS) negligent of gold and dollar hedging contracts

Ernst and Young Case

–       No substance to transaction except to remove unwanted assets

–       Repo 105 existed to manipulate financial information

–       Financial statements may be materially misleading even when they do not violate GAAP

–       Perfectly legal which makes it difficult to charge

–       Matthew Lee (long time employee) = Whistle Blower

–       Did not see or approved Repo 105

–       Ignored Matthew Lee’s Claim

–       Investigating the internal fraud claim = prohibited by Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Future Outlook

–       May experience reputation loss, but yet early to tell what will happen next

–       There is potential for:

–       Reforms of GAAPS and regulations

–       Shows the weakness of Sarbanes-Oxley

For more information, click on the following:

“The Credit of Crisis Visualized”

Brief documentary on “The Fall of Lehman”

 

The Official Valukas Report

Work Cited List

Works Cited

” A timeline of failure on Wall Street, from Lehman Brothers to Washington Mutual | Business | The Guardian .”  Latest news, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk . N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/27/wallstreet.useconomy3&gt;.

Buckstein, Jeff. “State targets E&Y in Repo 105 lawsuit.” The Bottom Line. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.thebottomlinenews.ca/index.php?section=article&articleid=494&gt;.

Christodoulou, Mario. “Lehman smoking gun leaves E&Y facing questions.” Accountancy Age. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1808180/lehman-smoking-gun-leaves-e-y-facing-questions >.

“Cuomo Sues Ernst & Young for Assisting Lehman Brothers in `Repo 105‚Ä≤ Fraud ¬´  Best make Moneys.” Best make Moneys. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://best-make-moneys.com/cuomo-sues-ernst-young-for-assisting-lehman-brothers-in-repo-105-fraud.html&gt;.

“FACTBOX: Five facts about Lehman Brothers’ past and present  | Reuters    .” Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/09/09/us-lehman-factbox-idUSN0930860520080909&gt;.

HENNING, PETER J.. “In Lehman Brothers’ Collapse, a Dwindling Chance of Charges – NYTimes.com.” Mergers, Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Hedge Funds – DealBook – NYTimes.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/in-lehmans-collapse-a-dwindling-chance-of-charges/?src=dlbksb&gt;.

“Lehman Brothers: In depth news, commentary and analysis from the Financial Times.” World business, finance, and political news from the Financial Times – FT.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.ft.com/lehman&gt;.

MERCED, MICHAEL J. DE LA. “The Origins of Lehman’s ‘Repo 105’ – NYTimes.com.” Mergers, Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Hedge Funds – DealBook – NYTimes.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/the-british-origins-of-lehmans-accounting-gimmick/&gt;.

 

 

 

By Heshani Makalande, Nahee Kim and Yutong Ouyang

Formation:

  • It was an American telecommunication company founded in 1963
  • The corporation was purchased by Verizon Communications after its bankruptcy in the year 2006
  • Formerly known as LDDS and WorldCom
  • The corporation is currently operating as MCI Inc

Timeline:

  • 1985:- investor Bernard Ebbers becomes the CEO
  • 1995:- LDDS acquires WilTel Inc for $2.5 billion and changed its name to WorldCom Inc
  • 1998:- WorldCom completes three mergers

MCI Communications Corporation ($40 billion)

Brooks Fiber Properties Inc ($1.2 billion)

CompuServe Corp ($1.3 billion)

  • 2002:-
  • CEO Bernard Ebbers resign, vice chairman John Sidgmore reins

Fires Scott Sullivan (CFO)

SEC files fraud charges against W.C

EX-CFO Sullivan and former controller David Myers are arrested and were found guilty

  • 2003:-

Changes its name to MCI and appoints Robert Blakely as (CFO)

Settles SEC charges

First criminal charges against (F.CEO) Ebbers

 

People Involved:

Bernard Ebbers

  • He is a Canadian born businessman
  • Former WorldCom CEO in U.S.
  • Co-founder of WorldCom 1995
  • Manipulating an $11 billion accounting fraud
  • Sentenced to 25 years in prison

Cynthia Cooper

  • Vice President of Internal Audit at WorldCom
  • Found out the accounting fraud in WorldCom

Scott D. Sullivan

  • Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Board member and Secretary
  • Performed WorldCom’s $11-billion accounting fraud
  • Sentenced to five years in Jail

The Accounting Scandal:

  • Biggest accounting fraud in U.S history after Enron
  • In 2005: Nine Counts

◦      One count of conspiracy

◦      One count of securities fraud

◦      Seven counts of filing false statement with securities regulator

  • Improperly accounted for more than $3.8 billion of expenses
  • Laid off 17,000 workers within the week

Stocks:

  • In 2002, Stock started to decline

◦      Falling of earnings in 2000’s

◦      Ebbers’ enormous personal debts

( WorldCom board loans him $375 million US)

◦      Accounting Fraud

◦      Stocks free-fall (dropped more than 95%)

◦      Peak more than $80 to almost nothing

Bankruptcy:

  • On July 21, 2002, after revealing actual condition of the WorldCom, the company files for the largest bankruptcy in corporate history in a month
  • Reported more than $107 billion in asset and $41 billion in debt

 

Impact on the accounting profession

Sarbanes- Oxley Act

  • It is a United States federal law established on July 30, 2002
  • The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is enforceable
  • It improve criterion for all American public company boards, management and public accounting firms

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

  • It is created due to many weighty accounting scandals
  • PCAOB goals promoting ‘informative, fair, independent audit reports’.
  • Any accounting firm that audit a public company must register under the PCAOB
  • PCAOB has power to investigate accounting infractions

Future Outlook

  • Form a separate audit committee apart from the company’s management and the company’s auditors to oversee the company’s financial management
  • In the long run, the company’s share prices would be undervalued, therefore the company should focus on building trust within the investors

 

Works Cited:

CBC News Online.(2006). The WorldCom story. March 28,2011,
<http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/worldcom/>

Dennis M and Edward R. WorldCom. March 28, 2011.<http://www.scu.edu/ethics/dialogue/candc/cases/worldcom.html>

Erika Johansen. “Role of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board”. Ehow.com. March 26, 2011 http://www.ehow.com/about_6547956_role-company-accounting-oversight-board.html

Fox News.com. MCI-WorldCom Timeline. 2005. March 29, 2011.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150521,00.html

Luisa B. (2002). WorldCom files largest bankruptcy ever. March 30,2011.<http://money.cnn.com/2002/07/19/news/worldcom_bankruptcy/>

Pulliam, Susan; Deborah Soloman. “How Three Unlikely Sleuths Exposed Fraud at WorldCom: Firm’s Own Employees Sniffed Out Cryptic Clues and Followed Hunches”. Wall Street Journal. March 25, 2011 http://www.happinessonline.org/MoralCode/LiveWithTruth/p23.htm

Simron R. and Rive A. D. A. (2002). WorldCom’s Collapse. March 30, 2011. <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6D81738F931A15754C0A9649C8B63>

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Web. 10 Mar. 2011. http://www.soxlaw.com

YouTube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g_d-phoUrU