April 2011


What is a Ponzi Scheme?

Ponzi schemes are a specific type of investment fraud, where criminals will take money from unsuspecting victims, promising to handle their victim’s money and get great returns. In reality, they are using money from newer victims whose money they have also taken to pay back original victims. Schemers will usually offer great returns on initial investments for no risk to the investor.  Ponzi schemes can be summed up in an infamous quote by Charles Ponzi, the man that ponzi schemes are named after, “the old game of robbing Peter to pay Paul”.

Ponzi schemes usually end in three ways:

  • Scheme creator runs off with money
  • No new investors, leading to a collapse of the scheme
  • Too many investors will ask for their return, leading to a collapse of the scheme

There are six warning signs or “red flags” the SEC, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, warns to look out for in order to identify a potential ponzi scheme:

  • No risk guaranteed returns
  • Suspiciously consistent returns that completely disregard changes in the market or stock values
  • Unlicensed / unregistered sellers or firms
  • Creators are shady, not open about strategies
  • Paperwork has numerous errors on it, like an unbalanced balance sheet
  • Difficulty getting money back

Development / Timeline

Ponzi schemes have been created ever since people needed money and have been created around the world, some notable ones are:

1880 – Sarah Howe’s “Ladies Deposits”

1920 – Charles Ponzi’s Stamp Scheme

1997 – Albania’s government backed ponzi schemes

2000 – Reed Slatkin’s Scientology Scheme

2001 – Haiti’s government advertised ponzi schemes

2007 – Lou Pearlman’s Investment schemes

2008 – Bernard Madoff, the biggest ponzi scheme in recorded history

*Through Madoff’s ponzi scheme, which went on for over 20 years, investors lost nearly 65 billion dollars, he is currently serving a 150 year jail sentence

The Impact

Accountants have failed to discover these frauds in timely manners, earning them bad reputations. An example would be that auditing firms and government checkers failed to notice Madoff’s scheme for nearly 20 years. The general population seems to think that “money managers [are] turning into money makers”.  Auditors and even government officials are constantly criticized for their inability to catch ponzi schemes and bring the creators to justice quickly enough.

The Future Outlook

Ponzi schemes will probably never stop, as long as people need money and they are smart enough and desperate enough, they will find a way to get money, whether it is through legal means or illegal ones, like creating a massive ponzi scheme. Even when a ponzi scheme is busted, the court procedures are very long and daunting, Bernard Madoff’s case is still being looked at today by the SEC, meaning less time can be spent on finding undiscovered ponzi schemes. People looking to invest their money must be cautious and learn from the past, being careful of where they place their money, if everyone is careful enough with their money, perhaps the impact of ponzi schemes can begin to decrease.

Video

An FBI video, with testimonies from victims of ponzi schemes, and advice from FBI agents can be watched here:

Frauds and How to Spot Trouble

Works Cited

Gandel, Stephen. “The Madoff Fraud: How Culpable Were the Auditors?”. Time. 17 December 2008. 7 April 2011 <http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1867092,00.html&gt;

Margolick, David. “His Last Name Is Scheme”. The New York Times. 10 April 2005. 7 April 2011 <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/10/books/review/10MARGOLI.html?_r=1&ref=ponzischemes&gt;

Nasaw, Daniel. “Timeline: Key dates in the Bernard Madoff case”. Guardian.co.uk. 16 February 2011. 7 April 2011 <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/mar/12/bernard-madoff-timeline-fraud&gt;

Washington, Rudy. “Bernard L. Madoff”. The New York Times. 16 February 2011. 7 April 2011 <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/bernard_l_madoff/index.html?inline=nyt-per&gt;

“The First Ponzi Scheme”. The Washington Post. 17 December 2008. 7 April 2011 <http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/12/the_first_ponzi_scheme.html&gt;

“The 10 Nastiest Ponzi Schemes Ever”. Business Pundit. 15 December 2008. 7 April 2011 <http://www.businesspundit.com/the-10-nastiest-ponzi-schemes-ever/&gt;

“Ponzi Schemes”. The New York Times. 7 April 2011 <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/frauds_and_swindling/ponzi_schemes/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=ponzi&st=cse&gt;

“Ponzi Schemes and Forensic Accountants”. Bella Online. 7 April 2011. <http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art49196.asp&gt;

United States. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Ponzi Schemes – Frequently Asked Questions. 7 April 2011 <http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm&gt;

Tyco international is a diversified manufacturing company. It mostly focused on fire protection, security solutions, and flow control. In 2001, company had revenue of $38 billion and about 240000 employees. Because of the one of the chairman’s, Dennis Kozlowski’s frauds, the company stood 28 billion in depts. In the frauds were involved also many employees of the company and a lot of shareholders lost millions of dollars.

He bought paintings worth $13m. And he shipped the empty boxes to one of the Tyco head quarters to avoid paying taxes, which were about 8%. When he took the loan, which was $19m, he did not pay it back and company was still paying the taxes. Nobody was told about that so even the shareholders and the company was staying on its market value until the truth was revealed. In 2001, the shares were more than $60 and they came down to about $15. Dennis Kozlowski and chief financial officer Mark Swartz stole in total $170 million and got about $430 million from deceitful stock sales.

  • 1960 the laboratories began operate experimenting government work
  • 1964 The company expended
  • 1975 Dennis Kozlowski joined the company as assistant controller. Tyco began to pay more attention on packaging, fire protection and electronics
  • 1992 Kozlowski became CEO
  • 1993 Kozlowski became the chair of the board and expended the company into health care
  • 1999 SEC began to analyze Tyco’s accounting practices
  • 2002 Dennis Kozlowski was found guilty for evading about 1 mill tax payments
  • 2002 It came to light that Kozlowski was forgiven the $19 million loans from the Tyco and company paid the income taxes on the loan. SEC began act towards the issue against Kozlowski and two other top executives who did not reveal Kazlowski’s forgiven loan
  • 2005 Kozlowski and Mark Swarts, Tyco’s chief financial officer were found guilty for twenty two numbers of frauds and went to prison for from 8 to 25 years.

 

There were accounting errors but not systematic fraud problem was found. The descendant of Kozlowski replaced 220 of 250 Tyco’s top managers. Because Kozlowski was selling the stocks without telling investors they lost about $90 million. At that time such things were done more easily because nobody was watching, but now there are a lot of lowers, accountants and board of directors so it is becoming quit impossible.

 

Youtube Video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sdFSeHy5ho

Prezi: http://prezi.com/ny0iirzvvnqc/edit/#1_4053307

Bibliography:

 

Lee Ann Obringer, “How Cooking the Books Works”, How Stuff Works, April 5 2011, http://money.howstuffworks.com/cooking-books11.htm

 

Caryn E. Neumann, “Tyco International scandal”, American-Business, April 5 2011, http://american-business.org/2781-tyco-international-scandal.html

 

“Tyco International In Shadow Of Scandal-13 September, 2002-News”, pravda, April 5 2011, http://english.pravda.ru/news/russia/economics/13-09-2002/17922-0/

 

“The Rise and Fall of Dennis Kozlowski”, Bloomberg Businessweek, April 5 2011, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_51/b3813001.htm

Textbook Questions:

  • pg. 539, #QS 10-6
  • pg. 542, #10-5
  • pg. 546, 10-2A

 


Advantage of a merger. Wikianswer.com. Retrieved from March 31, 2o11.
Benefit of mergers. Economichelp.org. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
Current Trends in Canadian Mergers and Acquisitions.Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP. 31 March, 2011.
History of Mergers and Acquisitions. EconomyWatch. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
McCaffery, Richard.(December 4, 2000).  Purchase and Pooling Headaches. Fool.com.Retrieved from March 31 , 2011.
Merger and Acquisition. Wikipedia. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
What are advantages and disadvantages of mergers? Wikianswer.com. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_mergers
What is the difference between a merger and a takeover?Investopedia ULC. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/mergervstakeover.asp
What is difference between a takeover and acquisition? Wikianswer.com. Retrieved from March 31, 2011.
Williams, Peter. (November 15, 2008). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Mergers. Yahoo! Inc.Retrieved fro March 31, 2011.

 

What is Merger and Acquisition?

lThe aspects of corporate strategy, corporate finance and management dealing with the buying, selling and combining of different companies that can make a more competitive, cost-efficient company on the market. It helsp a growing company in a given industry grow rapidly without having to create another business entity.
Definition
Merger: when two companies(shareholders from both companies), often equal sizes, agree to exist as a single new company
  • Horizontal merger: the combination of two firms from the same industry
Example: Boeing-McDonnell Douglas
  • Vertical Merger: merging with suppliers
Example: Time Warner Inc.
  • Conglomerate Merger: merging with firm that has unrelated business ties, there are two types of conglomerate mergers( pure and mixed)
Example: Cardinal Healthcare-Allegiance
Acquisition:  one firm is bought by another firm
  • Reverse merger: is a type of acquisition,  a private company takes over a public listed company
Example: acclaim Entertainment (AKLM) and non-operating Tele-Communications
Takeover: the control (ownership)  is transferred from one firm to another one
Distinction
Merger: shareholders of both firms agree to merge, often equal size, stocks of both companies are surrendered and the new stocks under the name of new companies are issued
Acquisition:  the bigger and more powerful firm acquire another smaller firm. Unlike merger, the stocks of both firms continue to be traded on the stock market
History of Merger and Acquisition
The first wave( 1897-1904):  during this period, merger occurred between firms that were monopoly in the same industries. The first wave was mostly horizontoal mergers that happened in heavy manufacturing industries. Most mergers were failed due to the fact that greater effiicency couldn’t be reached and the supreme court passed an act that anticompetitive mergers could be stopped
The second wave( 1916-1929):  most mergers happened between oligopolies due to the economic boom. Lot of technological develpments such as railroads and transportation by motor vehicles let mergers occurred. Government had a policy that also encouraged companies to work together. The types of mergers were mainly horizontal and conglomerate mergers. Food products, primary metals, petroleum products, transportatins euqipments and chemicals were the indusitries that chose to merge. Also, investment banks started helping firms to merge and acquisitate. The wave was stopped by the Great Depression.
The third wave( 1965-1969): the type of merger that occurred during this phrase were mainly conglomerate mergers which were motivated by extreme high stock price, strict antitrust laws and interest rate. Invest banks didn’t play the vital role because mergers were all financed from equities. The poor performance of conglomerate mergers resulted in the end of the third wave.
The fourth wave(1981-1989):  the target firms were often larger in size than the third wave mergers.  Industries that went mergers were oiland gas, pharmaceuticl, banking and airline. Foreign takeovers had been common since this phrase. The antitakeover law led to the end of this wave.
The fifth wave(1992-2000): globalizatin, stock market boom an deregulation caused the rise of the fifth wave merger which mainly invloved banking and telecommunications industries. Most mergers were euqity financed and firms mainly looked for long term profit motives. The stock market bubble led to the end of the merger.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • More investment
    • Less competition
    • Economies of scale
    • A merger is tax-free activity
    • A merger allows shareholders of smaller company increase their net worth
    • More innovated technical skills

    Cons

    • Conflict objective between the combined firms
    • Diseconomis of scale
    • Need approval from both sets of shareholders

    Example of merger and acquisition:

    •b
    • eBay is an Americna online auction and shipping internet company
    • People and business can buy and sell a broad variety of goods and services worldwide

    In the late 1990s, eBay made its first attempt at securing an in-house electronic payment system by acquiring Billpoint. However,  Billpoint was less popular than its competitior and this lack of following led to frustration and lack of familiarity for eBay’s users, who wanted to conduct buy or sell transactions with ease. After acquiring Billpoint, eBay made a run at the much more popular PayPal in the fall of  2002, for an acquisition price of $1.5 billion.

     

    PayPal is an e-commerce business. Allowing payments and money transfers to be made through the Internet.

    Timeline:

    Timeline of combination of eBay and PayPal

    Problem afteracquisition:

     

    Shill bidding is bidding that is used to inflate the price of a certain item. It is usually carried out with “shill” account(s), either the seller under an alternate account or another person in collusion with the seller. Shill bidding is detered by eBay. However, eBay has been criticized for not doing enough to combat the problem.
    Future Outlook
    • By acquiring PayPal, both entities leveraged each other’s customer base and strategic positioning
    • By offering complementary services, It will propel more business for each operation
    • However, the frauds may reduce  reputation  and good faith degree. If they do not fix up frauds properly, It will surely exert a significant influence on the future of their developmen

    Accounting Impact The purchase method: the purchasing company treats the taret firm as an investment, simply adding the target’s assest to its own fair market value

    The pooling of  interest method: two firms merge as euqal, in another word, either a new company is created or one company remains with the another company which become a part of the remaining company

    Comparison:

    Purchase Method: The goodwill is created due to excess of fair market value and needs to be amortized against expense.

    Pooling of interest method: it dones’t result in the creation of goodwill which leads to the higher value on the income statement. The value of assests and liabilities on each company’s book are carried forward to the  new combined company.

    Future Outlook

    M & A activity will increase in 2011, companies will pursue stragetic acquisiton and merger

    The huge demand come from Asia for commodities still increase as investors have been active in Canada

    Oil, gas and mining merger and acquisition will keep dominating in Canada

    Most Canadian companies will contiune to acquire U.S. institutions because economy in United State has been tough on companies

    The demand for renewable energy is high espeically for firms of carbon-heavy industry because they need to reduce carbon footprinting and pre-empt regulation

    Government of Canada has been strict and tough on foreign acquisition that contains national security, wealth funds which could be hard for foreign companies to complete acquisition

    A successful merger and acquisition

    Strategy

    • good for the company
    • new market shares and customers
    • improving technical skills
    Motive
    • understand why the target company is being sold
    Price
    • a low price cant gurantee a good deal
    Fit
    • people issues is important because it can affect financial performance
    Integration
    • make the annoucement of integration plan as soon as the decision of acquisition is being taken into consideration

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Textbook Questions:

    • pg 539, #QS 10-3, QS 10-4
    • pg 541, 10 -3
    • pg 542, 10-6, 10-7

    A little Colbert to start us off…

    Jeffery Leonard Interview

    Handouts, in case you lose them.

    Tax Shelter Definition :

    • A financial arrangement designed to reduce tax liability.
    • Tax shelters are any method of reducing taxable income resulting in a reduction of the payments to tax collecting entities, including state and federal governments. The methodology can vary depending on local and international tax laws.
    • A method used by investors to legally avoid or reduce tax liabilities.

    Direct Definition from the CRA AGENCY Website.

    Tax shelters are defined in the Income Tax Act. In very general terms, a tax shelter includes either a gifting arrangement or the acquisition of property, where it is represented to the purchaser or donor that the tax benefits and deductions arising from the arrangement or acquisition will equal or exceed the net costs of entering into the arrangement or the property. Also, a gifting arrangement where the donor incurs a limited recourse debt related to the gift will be a tax shelter. Generally a limited recourse debt is one where the borrower is not at risk for the repayment.

    The General Overview:

    Tax shelters, as put in to perspective by the definition are an arrangement that reduces tax liabilities. Less tax liability means more disposable income or Retained Profit.  It’s because of this that many businesses have resorted to illegal forms of Tax havens. Tax Shelters include investments in equipment leasing, breeding and cattle feeding programs, real estate, and gas and oil companies. There are some Tax Shelters which are legal and there are some which are illegal.

    Legal Tax Shelter.

    • Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) is a flexible investment account that can help you meet both your short- and long-term goals.
    • Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) is a personal savings plan registered with the Canadian federal government allowing you to save for the future on a tax-sheltered basis.

    TFSA

    •No maximum age
    •Not tax-deductible
    •Savings grow tax-free
    RRSP
    •Until the end of the year in which you turn 71
    •Yes, reduces taxable income
    •Savings grow Tax-deferred (not taxed until withdrawn)

    Major developments

    Illegal forms of Tax Shelters

    Financing arrangements:

    This is a common form of illegal financing arrangement as it would see the business or individual paying high levels of interest to another party thus reducing the investment income even to the extent of recording a loss. However the individual will actually create a massive capital gain when one withdraws the investment. The tax benefit comes from the fact that capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than the normal investment income such as interest or dividend.

    Canada has had its fair share of illicit Financial arrangements. An example would be that of the

    Offshore Companies

    In most jurisdictions authorities will not seek to tax companies which they treat as non-resident, save perhaps for a nominal fee -$350 BVI, £320 Isle of Man etc. Taxation legislations differ from country to country, and it is because of this that some countries will choose to avoid taxation in their home country or in a host country. This is mainly done in a bid to reduce the Tax liability and thus Tax benefits can be exploited. Example: If an Import company buys $1 of goods from India and sell for $3, Import Co. will pay tax on $2 of taxable income. However, tax benefits can be exploited if Import Co. is to setup an offshore subsidiary in the foreign nation to buy the same goods for $1, sell the goods to Import Co. for $3 and sell it again in the domestic market for $3. This allows Import Co. to report taxable income of $0 (because it was purchased for $3 and sold for $3), thus paying no tax.

    Here is a video to further illustrate this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhD6je4fQu8

    The Penalties

    • For providing misleading information upon the application for a Tax shelter scheme, the principal or agent is liable to a penalty greater than a $500 minimum fee of CAD$500.
    • For misrepresentation in tax planning arrangements, the principal will be liable to a minimum penalty of CAD$1000
    • For failing to provide the tax shelter identification number, the principal is liable to pay CAD$100.
    • Providing an incorrect tax shelter identification number
      • A fine from 100% to 200% of the cost of the tax shelter interest.
      • Imprisonment up to two years.
      • Both a fine and imprisonment.
    • Accountants across the world have lost their integrity.
    • This mainly because it is the accountants that are responsible for recording overstated balances and for preparing false receipts that will be assessed by the government.
    • However Tax shelters were set up to promote good behavior and offer assistance to the masses. It is the poor behavior of the few that has tarnished this image and with it the Image of Accountants.

    Tax shelters are usually created by the government to promote a certain desirable behaviour, usually a long term investment, to help the economy; in turn, this generates even more tax revenue. Alternatively, the shelters may be a means to promote social behaviours.

    Citations

    •          Santiago. (2010). Legal Tax Shelter Programs Can Save You Money…Find Out How. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from <http://www.mytaxmoneyback.com/canadaincometaxguide/2010/04/27/tax-shelters-are-not-a-legal-form-of-tax-avoidance-myth-buster-file-3-3/>

    •          RBC Royal Bank.(2011) Comparing TFSAs and RSPs: How do they stack up? Retrieved March 24, 2011, from < http://www.rbcroyalbank.com/products/taxfreesavings/tfsa-vs-rsp.html>

    http://business.mapsofindia.com/india-tax/concepts/shelters.html

    Lehman Brothers and Ernst & Young

    Lehman Brothers

    General Information

    • Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
    • Investment bank; the smallest giant on Wall Street
    • Survived 158 years
    • 60 offices around the world
    • More than 28,000 staff

    Brief Timeline

    1993 – Richard Fuld became the CEO of Lehman

    • Grew from traditional investment bank to using borrowed money to play the market itself.

    2000 – Borrowed significant amount of money to fund their investment in the housing markets.

    2007 – The firm closed its subprime lender: BNC Mortgage

    • Repo 105 is used as a tool for Lehman to extend and delay their downfall.
    • $27 million reduction in goodwill

    2008 – Reported loss of 3 billion dollars; sets $6 billion dollars stock sale

    Sept. 15th, 2008 – Filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

    • Largest bankruptcy filing in US history, holding over $600 billion assets.

    Effects to the Accounting Industry

    • The decisions made that led to the fall of Lehman were most miss calculation in investment choices
    • Since the issue is very recent, it is still under investigations.

    Repo 105

    It’s a repurchase agreement

    –       Short term loan in exchange for collateral

    –       Lehman: Categorized as sales instead of loan (Flashy Accounting!)

    –       Used international law of Britain to define sales

    –       Over 50 Billion in Repo 105 transactions

    –       Repo 105 used to temporarily remove the securities inventory from the balance sheet

    –       Repo money used to pay down liabilities

    –       Decreased leverage misled investors into thinking the company was very healthy

    Ernst and Young

    General Information

    –       Big 4 Accounting Firm

    –       Involved in a few other scandals (Akai Holdings, Sons of Gwalia)

    –       Responsible for: External Auditing and Investigating the internal fraud claim

    Brief Timeline

    • 2003: HealthSouth Corp

    – $109 million settlement of investor lawsuits

    • 2009: Bally’s Total Fitness Holding Corp.

    – Fined 8.5 million for approving fraudulent statements

    • 2009: Akai Holdings ($200 million settlement)

    – falsified court documents to avoid negligence charges

    • 2009: Sons of Gwalia

    – $125 Million (AUS) negligent of gold and dollar hedging contracts

    Ernst and Young Case

    –       No substance to transaction except to remove unwanted assets

    –       Repo 105 existed to manipulate financial information

    –       Financial statements may be materially misleading even when they do not violate GAAP

    –       Perfectly legal which makes it difficult to charge

    –       Matthew Lee (long time employee) = Whistle Blower

    –       Did not see or approved Repo 105

    –       Ignored Matthew Lee’s Claim

    –       Investigating the internal fraud claim = prohibited by Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    Future Outlook

    –       May experience reputation loss, but yet early to tell what will happen next

    –       There is potential for:

    –       Reforms of GAAPS and regulations

    –       Shows the weakness of Sarbanes-Oxley

    For more information, click on the following:

    “The Credit of Crisis Visualized”

    Brief documentary on “The Fall of Lehman”

     

    The Official Valukas Report

    Work Cited List

    Works Cited

    ” A timeline of failure on Wall Street, from Lehman Brothers to Washington Mutual | Business | The Guardian .”  Latest news, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk . N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/27/wallstreet.useconomy3&gt;.

    Buckstein, Jeff. “State targets E&Y in Repo 105 lawsuit.” The Bottom Line. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.thebottomlinenews.ca/index.php?section=article&articleid=494&gt;.

    Christodoulou, Mario. “Lehman smoking gun leaves E&Y facing questions.” Accountancy Age. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1808180/lehman-smoking-gun-leaves-e-y-facing-questions >.

    “Cuomo Sues Ernst & Young for Assisting Lehman Brothers in `Repo 105‚Ä≤ Fraud ¬´  Best make Moneys.” Best make Moneys. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://best-make-moneys.com/cuomo-sues-ernst-young-for-assisting-lehman-brothers-in-repo-105-fraud.html&gt;.

    “FACTBOX: Five facts about Lehman Brothers’ past and present  | Reuters    .” Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/09/09/us-lehman-factbox-idUSN0930860520080909&gt;.

    HENNING, PETER J.. “In Lehman Brothers’ Collapse, a Dwindling Chance of Charges – NYTimes.com.” Mergers, Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Hedge Funds – DealBook – NYTimes.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/in-lehmans-collapse-a-dwindling-chance-of-charges/?src=dlbksb&gt;.

    “Lehman Brothers: In depth news, commentary and analysis from the Financial Times.” World business, finance, and political news from the Financial Times – FT.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://www.ft.com/lehman&gt;.

    MERCED, MICHAEL J. DE LA. “The Origins of Lehman’s ‘Repo 105’ – NYTimes.com.” Mergers, Acquisitions, Venture Capital, Hedge Funds – DealBook – NYTimes.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Apr. 2011. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/the-british-origins-of-lehmans-accounting-gimmick/&gt;.

     

     

     

    By Heshani Makalande, Nahee Kim and Yutong Ouyang

    Formation:

    • It was an American telecommunication company founded in 1963
    • The corporation was purchased by Verizon Communications after its bankruptcy in the year 2006
    • Formerly known as LDDS and WorldCom
    • The corporation is currently operating as MCI Inc

    Timeline:

    • 1985:- investor Bernard Ebbers becomes the CEO
    • 1995:- LDDS acquires WilTel Inc for $2.5 billion and changed its name to WorldCom Inc
    • 1998:- WorldCom completes three mergers

    MCI Communications Corporation ($40 billion)

    Brooks Fiber Properties Inc ($1.2 billion)

    CompuServe Corp ($1.3 billion)

    • 2002:-
    • CEO Bernard Ebbers resign, vice chairman John Sidgmore reins

    Fires Scott Sullivan (CFO)

    SEC files fraud charges against W.C

    EX-CFO Sullivan and former controller David Myers are arrested and were found guilty

    • 2003:-

    Changes its name to MCI and appoints Robert Blakely as (CFO)

    Settles SEC charges

    First criminal charges against (F.CEO) Ebbers

     

    People Involved:

    Bernard Ebbers

    • He is a Canadian born businessman
    • Former WorldCom CEO in U.S.
    • Co-founder of WorldCom 1995
    • Manipulating an $11 billion accounting fraud
    • Sentenced to 25 years in prison

    Cynthia Cooper

    • Vice President of Internal Audit at WorldCom
    • Found out the accounting fraud in WorldCom

    Scott D. Sullivan

    • Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Board member and Secretary
    • Performed WorldCom’s $11-billion accounting fraud
    • Sentenced to five years in Jail

    The Accounting Scandal:

    • Biggest accounting fraud in U.S history after Enron
    • In 2005: Nine Counts

    ◦      One count of conspiracy

    ◦      One count of securities fraud

    ◦      Seven counts of filing false statement with securities regulator

    • Improperly accounted for more than $3.8 billion of expenses
    • Laid off 17,000 workers within the week

    Stocks:

    • In 2002, Stock started to decline

    ◦      Falling of earnings in 2000’s

    ◦      Ebbers’ enormous personal debts

    ( WorldCom board loans him $375 million US)

    ◦      Accounting Fraud

    ◦      Stocks free-fall (dropped more than 95%)

    ◦      Peak more than $80 to almost nothing

    Bankruptcy:

    • On July 21, 2002, after revealing actual condition of the WorldCom, the company files for the largest bankruptcy in corporate history in a month
    • Reported more than $107 billion in asset and $41 billion in debt

     

    Impact on the accounting profession

    Sarbanes- Oxley Act

    • It is a United States federal law established on July 30, 2002
    • The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is enforceable
    • It improve criterion for all American public company boards, management and public accounting firms

    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

    • It is created due to many weighty accounting scandals
    • PCAOB goals promoting ‘informative, fair, independent audit reports’.
    • Any accounting firm that audit a public company must register under the PCAOB
    • PCAOB has power to investigate accounting infractions

    Future Outlook

    • Form a separate audit committee apart from the company’s management and the company’s auditors to oversee the company’s financial management
    • In the long run, the company’s share prices would be undervalued, therefore the company should focus on building trust within the investors

     

    Works Cited:

    CBC News Online.(2006). The WorldCom story. March 28,2011,
    <http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/worldcom/>

    Dennis M and Edward R. WorldCom. March 28, 2011.<http://www.scu.edu/ethics/dialogue/candc/cases/worldcom.html>

    Erika Johansen. “Role of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board”. Ehow.com. March 26, 2011 http://www.ehow.com/about_6547956_role-company-accounting-oversight-board.html

    Fox News.com. MCI-WorldCom Timeline. 2005. March 29, 2011.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150521,00.html

    Luisa B. (2002). WorldCom files largest bankruptcy ever. March 30,2011.<http://money.cnn.com/2002/07/19/news/worldcom_bankruptcy/>

    Pulliam, Susan; Deborah Soloman. “How Three Unlikely Sleuths Exposed Fraud at WorldCom: Firm’s Own Employees Sniffed Out Cryptic Clues and Followed Hunches”. Wall Street Journal. March 25, 2011 http://www.happinessonline.org/MoralCode/LiveWithTruth/p23.htm

    Simron R. and Rive A. D. A. (2002). WorldCom’s Collapse. March 30, 2011. <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6D81738F931A15754C0A9649C8B63>

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Web. 10 Mar. 2011. http://www.soxlaw.com

    YouTube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g_d-phoUrU

     

     

     

     

     

     

    « Previous PageNext Page »